Greenhouse gas producers paid $63M for missing carbon-reduction targets
By Trish Audette, edmontonjournal.co
While Environment Minister Rob Renner called the 2009 results a reflection of the province's commitment to clean energy, critics said the government's statistics were little more than show.
"They're working very hard to make a lot out of not very much," Liberal environment critic Laurie Blakeman said Wednesday.
"This is not a tremendous news story, especially given the black eye that we're experiencing elsewhere."
Blakeman said real caps are needed on Alberta's industrial carbon emissions, not loose targets tied to emissions intensity.
Alberta's environmental record is often under fire from critics outside the province who see the oilsands as an embarrassment. Last month, Hollywood director James Cameron, who was born in Canada, called the oilsands a "black eye" on the country's environmental record.
Alberta Environment officials pointed Wednesday to statistics showing more big companies are buying into wind power, other renewable energy, and finding ways to offset their emissions.
About 100 companies -- such as oilsands operators, coal-fired power generators and other industrial producers -- are expected to pay into the Climate Change and Emissions Management Fund if their carbon emissions are above 100,000 tonnes and they miss targets to reduce greenhouse gases.
"These are great numbers," said Alberta Environment's Andy Ridge. "We are seeing reductions at facilities, we are seeing reductions in the offset market ...."
Payments to the Climate Change and Emissions Management Fund were down in 2009 compared to 2008 ($82.3 million).
The fund was first introduced in mid-2007, and that year the province collected $41.8 million from industrial emitters.
NDP MLA Rachel Notley called the emissions fund's revenue for last year "a small drop in the bucket," and argued the threshold for companies paying up needs to be lowered.
Renner has said the province has considered lowering the bar to 50,000 tonnes, but at the moment there are no firm plans to lower the threshold.
Since 2007, Alberta Environment reports emissions have been reduced by 17.3 million tonnes.
But overall, the province's emissions dropped by just one per cent in a year. Comparing the province's greenhouse-gas output in 2008 (244 million tonnes) to 1990 (170 million tonnes), Alberta's carbon emissions have actually gone up by 44 per cent in about two decades.
"What this latest announcement shows is that the Alberta government is increasing their spin to try to convince the public that greenhouse-gas emissions are not increasing because of the tarsands," said Sierra Club director Sheila Muxlow. "Alberta's climate plan still allows for total emission growth until at least 2020. This is not an action plan, this is a spin plan, and any thinking person would not buy it."
BY THE NUMBERS
- -100: The number of Alberta companies that typically exceed the 100,000-tonne emission threshold. Upon meeting this baseline, companies are required to pay into the emissions fund, buy into renewable energy or show other signs of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.
- -60-70: The percentage of companies that pay into the provincial fund because they exceed allowed emissions.
- -17.3 million tonnes -- The amount of emission reductions the province has reported since mid-2007. Alberta Environment says there was a seven-million-tonne reduction in 2009.
- -244 million tonnes: Alberta's total emissions for 2008. The government says this is a one-per-cent drop from 2007. In 1990, the province's total emissions were 170 million tonnes.
Source: Government of Alberta